(Part 17 is here.)
In my experience, whenever I have raised these problems with religious believers, the explanations they have come up with have always missed the point. An expert in the history of the ancient Near East can indeed come up with an elaborate hypothesis as to why there is so little evidence for David and Solomon. A Muslim apologist can indeed assert that the Biblical account of Solomon is corrupted where it contradicts or lacks details given in the Qur’an. Yes, you can cook up theories that agree with your religious beliefs to fit the evidence (or, even better, which ignore the evidence). But then the theory is only meaningful for someone who already accepts that your religion is true, or special, to begin with. If you want your argument to be convincing to someone who is not already a believer, you have to explain why it cannot be applied just as well to another, and possibly conflicting, religion.
Here is a theory that fits the evidence: the Biblical accounts of David and Solomon’s splendour are simply made-up… » [Expand post] [Permalink]